2 For Tuesday | April 28, 2026


#1 Controversy on Faith In Housing Approvals Concerning

The Faith in Housing Initiative was launched in 2024 with the intent to (according to the City of Charlotte’s website) “equip faith-based organizations with the tools, resources, and partnerships necessary to bring affordable housing projects to life.”

REBIC recently shared information about the Initiative and included details about the original twelve cohorts that were selected. Since the program’s launch, religious institutions have stepped forward and are seeking approval to develop portions of their properties to be dedicated towards the building of affordable and attainable housing without having to seek public funding.

That’s why the actions that took place last Monday were confusing to many observers. Two rezoning petitions, 2025-030 by Tryon Advisors, LLC and 2025-129 by True Homes faced pushback from several Members of Council. The property owners in these cases were Cooks Memorial Presbyterian Church and University City United Methodist Church and between the two projects would produce 160 new townhomes.

Councilman Malcolm Graham offered motions to deny both projects and lengthy discussions ensued. Ultimately the rezonings were approved by narrow margins of 7-3 and 6-4 respectively. This came after both petitions received unanimous approval from the Planning Commission and were supported by Planning Staff.

Video of April 20, 2026 Charlotte City Council Zoning Meeting

 

My Take:  We’re troubled by this seeming change of priority and lack of support for a program that is already opening up opportunities for community members to obtain housing. Charlotte City Council with the support of City Staff launched this initiative to urge local churches with excess property to partner with private developers to produce urgently needed affordable and attainable housing. In the process of doing so, Council received complaints from the neighbors and instead of defending their positions, gave too much power to these dissidents. That’s not leadership.

It seems we are constantly in a mode of hesitation. But let’s remember the recently passed transportation referendum will soon turn on the flow of dollars to the Metropolitan Public Transportation Authority (MPTA) to begin funding enhanced infrastructure projects. Additionally, the City of Charlotte last year produced its 30-Year Transportation Investment Plan that specifically articulates its mobility improvement strategy and breaks it down by City Council District.

While the Council pauses, I’d recommend we recommit to educating the public about plans and projects and timelines. The document linked above is a great summary of the infrastructure improvements slated to be made in the near future, with some already in process. And as citizens and business owners in real estate and land development, remind Councilmembers that the Faith in Housing Initiative was their initiative! Let’s keep it going!


#2 Statesville Planning Board Text Amendment Language May Favor Flexibility for “Missing-Middle Housing”

Statesville’s April 28th Planning Board Meeting, that will take place tonight, April 28, 2026 has some agenda items that caught our eye. They are specific to opening up flexibility in the code that has previously been prohibitive to opening housing supply. We share the agenda items here but encourage you to read the entire agenda and be aware of the changes being considered.

  • Innovation & Flexibility (IF) District: The UDC is antiquated and may inadvertently discourage proposals that may be in alignment with the 2045 Comprehensive Plan, strategic initiatives of the City, or innovative uses. The proposed text amendment creates opportunities for a conditional zoning district that provides pre-determined flexibility and allows a broad mix of compatible uses or a vital singular use.
  • Small Scale Mixed Use: The UDC discourages small-scale mixed-use development (commercial on the bottom floor with upper story residential). The proposed amendment encourages infill, mixed residential by providing a by-right path forward and relaxing requirements for often constrained sites.
  • Small-Scale Multifamily: The UDC has provisions for duplexes, requiring the lot size to be significantly greater than the requirements for single-family residential. The UDC is silent on triplexes and considers four (4) or more units to be multi-family or townhomes. The proposed text amendment provides a by-right path forward for infill, missing middle housing.
  • Townhomes & Apartments: The UDC provides an option for projects of 4 or more units to obtain a Special Use Permit or a Conditional Rezoning. The proposed text amendment would change the process to Conditional Rezoning to allow community input and more flexible consideration by the City Council.

    My Take:  As we do our best to influence better outcomes across the region, we are always pleased to see municipal leadership acknowledging the need for ordinances that make sense. There is no question housing is becoming less affordable and constraining supply will only make things worse. As such, we would encourage other communities to take a hard look at their development ordinances just as Statesville did as it works to ease regulation and embrace change. We understand that in addition to the amendments we referenced above, more are on the way. This is definitely proof that our REBIC advocacy is working! Thank you to Statesville for stepping up and doing the right thing.

BACK TO LATEST NEWS
Let’s Combine Your Purpose with REBIC’s Power.
Sign Up to Join Our Email List:
Name